This might be just me not understanding how AT works, so I’ll post it as a discussion before considering posting it as a feature request.
Here’s an example of what I mean:
Let’s say I want to track my runs using AT. So I create an object type “Run” with date, time, distance, pace and mood. I then create a set for those called “My runs”. From then on I can just add my runs directly in set view.
In this situation, it doesn’t make sense to me to “Name” each individual run… I just want the Set to show date, time, distance, pace and mood. However I can’t even hide the Name relation in the Set.
How would you implement what I described above without having this empty useless Name relation?
From what I understand, Anytype should allow users to create Objects with no Name, since not all object needs one. I assume each object has a unique identifier anyway (?). Again, I feel I might be missing something here, so please educate me!