Thank you for wanting to hear from users around the world about the future development of your product. Keep it up!
Iām just starting to transition to project and task management in AnyType, and thereās a lot Iām missing to switch from TickTick.
Calendar (timeline) view (also agree with @kerbless)
The ability to customize a calendar or timeline based on the relationship of objects would allow for better visualization of tasks and goals (projects). Notion and TickTick can do this, but AnyType does not yet.
Graph
Yes, itās important to me. I want to be able to clearly understand how tasks will work in the graph view: will complete tasks be displayed? Will it be possible to hide them? But at the same time, for example, goals can be left even if they are completed? Will there be no possibility to customize tasks in the graph so flexibly?
Iāll say right away that as a user, Iām not quite sure which way to display tasks, goals, and projects would be better in AnyType.
Notifications
This is something AnyType canāt do at all. And the MVP is to send notifications to the device at a certain time with a title and description of the task, and when you click on it, immediately open the required object.
But to this should be added the ability to send notifications on a certain day (usually a deadline), as well as notifications N days/hours/minutes/weeks before, repeat the notification every day until the task is completed, and so on. I think TickTick has implemented this very well.
Quick add
The ability to tap the AnyType icon on mobile devices and select āAdd Taskā and fill in a title and short description would be a great innovation.
Time trecker (not MVP)
The ability to build in functionality for tracking the time spent on a task and then displaying it in a calendar or time line helps to visualize the efforts expended.
But this does not apply to a minimally viable product.
Widgets outside of AnyType
It would be nice if the user could ātake outā a set of tasks or a set for a specific project (goal) outside the application. And already on the desktop, perform minimal actions with these tasks: view (only the names), mark completion (the widget should be interactive), and when you click on a task, go to the desired object.
Default object type for a view
Collections are a great way to automate object linking. But there is no way to set what type of object will be created.
For example, in a course page, I would like to place a list of tasks that I need to complete. I would create a collection (not a set!), customize it, and start creating a list of tasks. But to do this, I need to change the type of object.
It would be great if I could define that in view A of collection A, objects of type A and template A will be automatically created, and in view B of collection A, objects of type B and template B. I hope I havenāt confused you 
Why not a set? Because when you create objects in a set, they wonāt be automatically linked to it, as is the case with collections.
Also agree with @dzlg, our cool Nightly AnyTyper 
Maybe I missed something else. So if I remember, Iāll update this answer or add another one in this thread.