Agreed. That’s why we need unlinked mentions and a distinction between related/linked/unlinked connection - to distinguish the value of link/relation.
I image for a recipe, we would be using link from this object instead (?) I personally wouldn’t go to Rice object and add every rice recipe - that’s like every meal I have 
Are inline relations conceptualised as object first and relation second? Like a set (query) or collection (manual) or like the table in library (uneditable and only show object type)?
Would it support displaying a relation as the identification / reference point of the linked objects? e.g. Have APA reference relation (or alias) on a journal article and display it as ‘name’ in list of link, and rename ‘link to this object’ as References in plain text style ← Like inline set’s title different to set, good for zettlekasten and disambiguators too.
P.S. Team’s efforts are always appreciated.
