This might be just me not understanding how AT works, so I’ll post it as a discussion before considering posting it as a feature request. Here’s an example of what I mean: Let’s say I want to track my runs using AT. So I create an object type “Run” with date, time, distance, pace and mood. I then …

I don’t know if this helps you, but now that we have the Note Layout, you can have a Type with no Name field. You cannot disable Name field in Sets, I would consider this a Bug since there is no Name field in the Type. But the Name column a Set for a Nameless Type does at least just show the content…

Maybe it could be left as it is: if we don’t type a name, the object is named ‘Untitled’ by default. Additionally we could have an option to hide the name column in the sets.

@qualquertipo Since the name is kinda a mandatory relation shown in Sets, I’d go with adding the date manually as the name instead of a date relation. But the best way to go about this is to have an option to hide the name relation from sets. Or the team could provide us with an option of selecting …

@thiago_nascimentodf Opa! Yeah, I’d be happy to have them be named “Untitled” (as long as I eventually can pick a different Relation to be shown on top as the title when opening the object - in my run example, I’d prefer the title to be the date; or even better, something like “Run for 2021/03/12”,…

I’m not sure about the working but I probably guess it’s not required. Either way it would be great to have the ability to hide name in sets, Kindly raise a Feature request and i’d be happy to upvote it :grinning:

@lynxlove , the Name relation seems to be required at the page design, because it is used as a navigation anchor to the object. If we are going to be able to hide the name column we would have to provide another way to navigate to the object. I see some options to solve it: have an extra column on…

True. All solutions you suggested seem good. Better than having the Name relation be mandatory (and/or always visible).

Thanks for reminding me! It seems I never created the request. Sorry for that Here it is: [image] Ability to have Sets without a Name relation (have other relation as primary one) Feature Requests Not all objects have names, so would be good to be able to have a Set in wh…

Should Anytype allow Objects without a Name relation?

Talk

qualquertipo January 30, 2022, 10:51am 10

Thanks for reminding me! It seems I never created the request. Sorry for that

Here it is: