I agree with what @Jeroen said here. I know some of us are very passionate with how Anytype gets built, and we want it to be it’s best form. We also have to keep in mind that the developers’ best interest is always aligned with the users, since they are building the app mainly for the users. Thanks to the Anytype team for doing what you can in taking out feedbacks. Ultimately I trust the Anyteam to know what they are doing since they have a long term vision for the app (which consist largely of user satisfaction in mind) and they have more data points that we the users do not have, including the feedback from us. Keep up the great work.
I’m excited to see this coming. Particularly want to see what you mean by “These fields will reside within types, which will become strong”, as I do not understand it fully right now.
While we’re here, I just want to take this opportunity to voice that I would appreciate if Anyteam use the term “Properties” instead of “Fields”, especially if the use case of Fields is exactly the same as what Properties are in Notion. There are enough alternate terms Anytype came up with for things that already exist in other bigger platforms that people are familiar with, and naming something differently solely for the sake of being different irks me (and a lot of others too, ehem, the Subreddit). Please take this into consideration. This is my stance from only reading the little about Fields that’s mentioned in @anton’s comment.