Hi @Jeroen thanks for mentioning this! In sprint review 37 a lot of cool stuff was shared and demoed without a target release date, but in sprint review 38 just the stuff that is about to be released with the 1-Aug release was presented. This might have had the unwanted effect that it is no longer clear for the reader what information is relevant for which moment/release.
I will need to reread the sprint review notes to make sure it is clear what is and what is not to be expected based on the sprint review meeting notes.
@Jeroen I appreciate the feedback and I indeed, a sudden move towards much more transparency could be mistaken for lots of promises instead of just sharing the current state of affairs. It should help to explicitly mention how people should take the information shared in these topics or any topic for that matter.
Again, I’m happy you took the time to share your thoughts on this, as I wouldn’t have known this was a side effect of sharing these meeting notes!
Edit: @Jeroen does the text added in the “Note” paragraph cover your concern(s)? For subsequent sprint review meeting notes I’m planning on a shortened version of that paragraph