This way if we change a related object’s name, all objects with such naming convention will be updated, keeping consistence. 
Beyond display function
With the idea of “relation as objects” (as mentioned in my feedback and sprint review 58,59,60), naming convention with relation could help identify the nature of object / relation object.
For example, [A] is (inspired by) [B]
Syntax: [Object] (relation type) [Object]
Graph view display: as relation object in the middle of Object A and B
Hierarchy: relation object as child (indicated by relation type) to both A and B.
P.S.
Maybe this is beyond the current “relation as object” scope, more towards dynamic relations.
Building title from relations helps indicate co-relation and contexts of relation. Supports creation of relations that are specific to collection / projects.