Add "or" logic for the filter of set and collection

[C.c]

These are some of the related feature requests.

Add search syntax to filter objects/relations/types/tags/etc

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. It would be great now that we have many types/relations and various objects (that sometimes have similar names) to be able to use some sort of syntax within the search function. Describe the solution you’d like For example : typename:XXXXXX ===> would bring up a specific object type only tag:XXXXXXX ===>would bring up objects with specific tags relationname:value XXXXXXX ===> would bring up items with a specific value in a spec…

Advanced Filters / Queries

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Filters in its current state seems to be a boolean AND of all the filters added. What I would love is to be able to establish relations between the filters myself, so that I can then filter if say Linked Projects contains Something or Linked project is empty. Right now, it is not possible to this or that kind of filter Describe the solution you’d like A formula like bar above the list of filters where the user can specify how they…

Query, and filter for set and collection treat multiple strings equally

CURRENT PROBLEM Using filter to find objects in set, there must be a sequence in which relation is filtered first prior to other relation and it is inclusion only. e.g. (Relation 1 AND criteria for relation 1) AND (Relation 2 AND criteria for relation 2) WHAT DO YOU RECOMMEND Allow (Relation 1 AND criteria for relation 1) OR/AND (Relation 2 AND criteria for relation 2) Consider all query logic, like how it is currently considered within each relation criteria input. [image] HOW COULD IT BE D…