Custom restrictions/validation for number, text relations

[C.c]

Probably related to the following requests which were turned into discussions (by team).

Nested Relation / Treat Relations as any other objects / Sub-Relations

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. There are certain things that are not cleanly achievable with the current relations implementation. i.e, One cannot have a qualifier for numbers. Say there is a relation called as distance traveled, one has to remember the unit for the data or to use the unit name in the relations name. Another example is the lack of currency qualifier. There are ways to achieve it, one could create a new type called currency that takes two values, …

Multi-dimensional Relations

Ever since the introduction of “relations as objects” and also “inline sets” into Anytype, I was toying with the idea of incorporating more and more aspects of my life into Anytype but in doing so as I mentioned in my other posts, I felt some limitations and lack of features can get in the way of that. Browsing through the community, I came across some interesting and brilliant ideas (multi-type and inheritance) of what could be the next step for the “object, relations, sets” philosophy of Anyty…