Add Anytype to the F-Droid store

It does not have a FLOSS licence in the first place and it’s not completely open source.

So it has to use one of the licenses listed here in this example: F-Droid Search: image , and must rely entirely on open-source software.
However, it looks like some Anti-Features are still allowed, right?
So, in other words, as long as the app is fully open-source, relies only on opensource dependencies, includes certain anti-features, and keeps its original license unmodified, it’s acceptable?

So for my guess, the license Anytype uses is a no go for f-droid…

Anytype has it’s own licence. Anti features or not, the licence itself wouldn’t be allowed in the first place.

The F-Droid repo is where all these licenses are required. There are other, less restrictive repositories available, as well as an option of self-hosting one.

Although, the request here is for inclusion into the F-Droid store and not just “make AnyType available IN F-Droid”, sadly.

Seems like.. Anytype won’t be added to the f-droid store.

Checkpoint F-Droid requirement Anytype Android (anytype-kotlin) Result
App license is FOSS (OSI/FSF-approved) OSI/FSF-approved free/open-source license required for main repo “Any Source Available License 1.0” with noncommercial + “Allowed Networks” limits :cross_mark:
Commercial use allowed Commercial use and redistribution permitted Only noncommercial, or commercial use limited to whitelisted networks :cross_mark:
Unrestricted redistribution/modification No field-of-use or network restrictions Network whitelist and consent from “Any Association” :cross_mark:
Buildable from public source Source public and reproducibly buildable Public repo exists; build plausible but license blocks main repo :white_check_mark:/:warning:
No mandatory proprietary SDKs No closed SDKs/services required to build Not established here; needs audit :warning:
Backend is self-hostable/configurable Prefer easy user reconfiguration to FOSS backend “Allowed Networks” suggests centralized authorization :warning:/:cross_mark:
Eligible for main F-Droid repo Must satisfy FOSS licensing and build rules Fails due to non-FOSS client license :cross_mark:
Anti-Feature: NonFreeNet (if relicensed) Flag if relies on controlled/nonfree network Likely if default/realistic use needs authorized network without easy user reconfig :warning:/:white_check_mark:
Anti-Feature: Tracking Flag if tracking present No evidence of trackers from available info :white_check_mark: (no flag indicated)
Anti-Feature: Ads Flag if ads present No ads indicated :white_check_mark: (no flag indicated)
Anti-Feature: NonFreeAssets Flag if ships nonfree media/assets Not established; requires audit :warning:/:white_check_mark: (unknown)
Protocols vs client license Protocols can be FOSS even if client isn’t Protocols MIT; Android client is source-available, not FOSS :warning: (blocks inclusion)