# Should Anytype allow Objects without a Name relation?

**URL:** <https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342>\
**Category:** Talk\
**Created:** [October 15, 2021, 9:20pm UTC](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342 "2021-10-15T21:20:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![qualquertipo](https://community.anytype.io/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/ecae2f/32.png) [@qualquertipo](https://community.anytype.io/u/qualquertipo)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2021, 10:18am UTC](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342/4 "2021-10-16T10:18:56Z")

</div>

@thiago_nascimentodf Opa! Yeah, I’d be happy to have them be named “Untitled” (as long as I eventually can pick a different Relation to be shown on top as the title when opening the object - in my run example, I’d prefer the title to be the date; or even better, something like “Run for 2021/03/12”, where the date Relation is inline in the title).

@lynxlove Does every Set need to have a primary Relation? In that case, either solution you mentioned is good. Allowing to pick a different Relation to be primary, or just allow hiding Name (even though its primary).

In any case, yes just being able to hide that column would be great!

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342)._