# Should Anytype allow Objects without a Name relation?

**URL:** <https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342>\
**Category:** Talk\
**Created:** [October 15, 2021, 9:20pm UTC](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342 "2021-10-15T21:20:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![qualquertipo](https://community.anytype.io/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/ecae2f/32.png) [@qualquertipo](https://community.anytype.io/u/qualquertipo)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2022, 10:51am UTC](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342/10 "2022-01-30T10:51:19Z")

</div>

Thanks for reminding me! It seems I never created the request. Sorry for that

Here it is:

> [@Ability to have Sets without a Name relation (have other relation as primary one)](https://community.anytype.io/t/ability-to-have-sets-without-a-name-relation-have-other-relation-as-primary-one/4577):
>
> Not all objects have names, so would be good to be able to have a Set in which the primary relation is something else. For example, if I’m tracking runs, it makes sense to use the date as primary relation (and have no Name relation). Related to this discussion: [https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342/4](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342/4)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.anytype.io/t/should-anytype-allow-objects-without-a-name-relation/2342)._
